Watch a brief video and enrol here first:

Who is this project intended for?

a.    Laboratory professionals from large, small, specialized and general laboratories who attended the AACC BrownBag session “Evaluate acceptability of patient risk at monthly/regular QC review.”
b.    Researchers, consultants, colleagues, and “QC keeners” invited by Zoe Brooks, M.O.R.E. Quality™ Consultants.
c.    People who contact us through social media posts and would like to either participate or review the data for publication.   <span style="color: #0000ff; text-decoration: underline;"></span>

What can you do?

  1. quantify patient risk from medical laboratory ‘errors’ by submitting in your analytical & quality control processes
  2. validate your QC process against the ‘Prime Directive’ of Risk Management: “At the least, the ability of the QC procedures to detect medically allowable error should be evaluated." 
  3. examine risk metrics of up to 300 analytical processes
    1. mainly for glucose, calcium and sodium
  4. evaluate the value of a NEW approach to quality management in terms of:
    1. the number of patients you can potentially save from risk and
    2. the associated clinical/legal savings
    3. based on your risk drivers
  5. participate in discussions and surveys on reports
  6. co-author, post and discuss results


Participate in the first Mini Risk Evaluation Program to examine:
  1. existing patient risk: as driven by analytical process quality relative to medical goals
  2. potential risk if the analytical process failed: as driven by statistical quality control process effectiveness relative to acceptable risk criteria
  3. potential benefits of Mathematically-OptimiZed Risk Evaluation™ as reduction of the acceptable/verified number and cost of errors